Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Frankenstein (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Redirect per below. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:19, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Frederick Frankenstein
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

No out-of-universe notability, no sources. Was redirected per AFD in May 2008, but an IP undid the redirect (seemingly in bad faith) only 3 months later. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:27, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Why isn't it "Froaderick Fronkensteen"? Nothing here that's not equally well handled in the movie and play articles. Delete per Hammer.--Arxiloxos (talk) 04:03, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect (is there such a thing) to restore previous consensus. The IP editor violated an AfD conclusion without justifying it, so no need to wait. D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  19:13, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy redirect as per the above, and also, completely unnecessary and unreferenced. One suspects a lack of persistent coverage of the subject to establish notability in its own right.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:49, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.