Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Tibbenham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Since there was so little participation, I don't think it's possible to close this with a definite consensus to do anything here. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:38, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Frederick Tibbenham

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable and the links never support the article's content. The only nearly relevant and notable link I found is this NY Times article which requires payment. The other links I found were either promotional or never supported the present content. SwisterTwister  talk  21:09, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Not sure how to edit the above, as the article seems to have been removed. My sources are all contained with my 'Friends of Oakhurst page for checking, and include photographs from the War Museum (propeller made at the Frederick Tibbenham factory in Ipswich) plus FT auction items found via keyword search. Earlier career as picture framer found on Census site. Perhaps you could show me, or advise me on how this article needs to be managed, rather than deleting it, as I am trying to save his house from demolition by developers, and having a Tibbenham entry on Wiki is very important to this end, and because of his propellers which are in a number of private and public collections, and because of his house at the Ideal Home Exhibition (Tudor Cottage) which was found by the Daily Mail, I think my sources are in line with Wiki expectations! Look forward to hearing from you, Pandora. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pandoramelly (talk • contribs) 08:08, 1 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. I think we may be able to demonstrate notability here, and I'll give it a go. -  Ka renjc 16:20, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 21:23, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Gongshow  Talk 02:49, 14 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.