Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fredrick Douglass Houses


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination Withdrawn, non-admin close. Redfarmer (talk) 08:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Fredrick Douglass Houses

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I proded this one a while back for notability and it was contested with the reason "numerous news accounts available." Since I don't live in the area, I held off taking it to AfD to give someone a chance to source it and establish notability but no one has yet to and the only coverage I'm finding is trivial mentions. Redfarmer (talk) 00:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I added a few sources that should establish notability. Alansohn (talk) 02:49, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Has relevant external coverage concerning the subject from reliable sources. Mostlyharmless (talk) 03:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: houses were the subject of discussion of whether to tear down or keep, and they were kept due to their historic nature. Unfortunately that is locked behind pay door in the NYT Archive and I can't get full text access at the moment. I'm probably not going to have time to work on the article between now and when this would expire, however. Travellingcari (talk) 05:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Notability established by Alansohn. Withdrawing. Redfarmer (talk) 08:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.