Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FreeDOM (programming)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 03:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

FreeDOM (programming)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is mostly a copy of http://www.codeproject.com/useritems/freedom.asp and is as far as I can tell wholly made up of original research about a non-notable invention of its author, CodeAdams. The article cites no reliable sources, and portions of it are written in the first person. (indeed, the "History" section proclaims: “The FreeDOM technique was invented by Adam Smith on September 28, 2007.”) Some of its content is potentially relevant to the article about Comet (programming). jacobolus (t) 05:03, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Seems to have no other mentions other than primary source article on codeproject.  It would be easier to decide to keep if this project had a presence on SourceForge/GoogleCode/etc, had existed for more than a few days, had a non-trivial number of users/contributors, and had articles or references on other notable websites.   See no original research and no madeup things and notability. -- Bovineone 16:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - as noted above --Barista | a/k/a マイケル | T/C 17:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy vanispamcruft. —Ruud 07:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. User:CodeAdams is probably Adam Smith--the inventor of FreeDOM. The article is mostly original research.-- Mumia-w-18 07:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Because of the strong promotional tone, if this were not already at AfD, a G11 speedy deletion might be considered. The absence of sources implies there is no way to demonstrate notability. EdJohnston 13:44, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.