Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Dougie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was '''Delete. Completely unsourced, possibly a hoax. No prejudice against recreation, but I and several others cannot find any sources to support this subject.'''  Frank  |  talk  11:18, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Free Dougie

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No Google hit or sources. At the least it fails verifiability and at the most it's a hoax. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:43, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete fails verifiability as per nom, if the author can add some verifiable sources that would help--Daviddavey (talk) 03:45, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Fails WP:V.  WP:HOAX until further supply of verification from original contributor.   - Jameson L. Tai   talk  ♦  guestbook  ♦  contribs  03:50, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete ASAP. Drmies (talk) 04:05, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST, but it almost certainly fails a host of other WP:NOT criteria. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 04:28, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:V and looks like a hoax. • Gene93k (talk) 06:12, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have found no evidence this group exists and if Oscar Elías Biscet is Douglas' cell mate, how come Biscet's article makes no mention of him. If we decide to cover this, it should be about the person instead of the group. Right now it is not verifiable. - Mgm|(talk) 09:25, 27 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.