Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Egyptian Army


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:06, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Free Egyptian Army

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Most likely a hoax rebel group. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 18:51, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:25, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:25, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now at best as none of this suggests even minimally better general notability. Notifying tagger in case he's not aware of this current AfD.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:26, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete deceptive attempt by the Egyptian regime to smear the supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood (Qatar, Turkey) and to incite public outcry against them. News articles on this alleged group appear solely on websites with a pro-Egyptian government slant, similar to the hoax opposition figure Khalid AlHail (soon to be nominated) which was fabricated by Egyptian newspaper Youm7. Elspamo4 (talk) 23:44, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - There are several news article suggesting that this group may exist, for example here, but none of them cover the subject in any real depth. The suject fails WP:ORGDEPTH.- MrX 01:45, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.