Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Grass Union


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:22, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Free Grass Union

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A few hits here suggest that the band plays bluegrass and that it exists, but that seems to be it. Sorry. Drmies (talk) 01:14, 28 April 2011 (UTC)


 * This page was created for informational purposes. Please do not delete the page, because it is helpful to those who are interested in the contributions this band has given to music. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dslove27 (talk • contribs) 01:31, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Where did the Happy Cassie page go? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dslove27 (talk • contribs) 01:40, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello, this is Cassandra Spies. I gave permission to Danielle, user dslove27, to use the information about Free Grass Union and to create the band page as well as a page for me. These page are valuable to the fans of my band and I would appreciate it if they could remain intact. Many hours were put into the creation of these pages. Please reconsider the deletion decision. If you have any question about verification, please contact me at xxxxx@gmail.com. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cspies87 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The guidelines for inclusion (yes, there are guidelines here) are found generally in WP:N and specifically for bands in WP:BAND. Happy Cassie was an article without any kind of reliable source, and for a biography of a living person (see WP:BLP) that is unacceptable; the article is redirected to the band article. Myspace and Facebook are not reliable sources. There is no indication that this band is notable by our standards. If the band has made contributions to music, there is no doubt that reviews and newspaper articles can be found and added to the article--but see WP:RS for what sources are reliable. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:58, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

I have read the guideline and understand why the individual band members pages should not be included. As for the band's page, I have posted new information from reviews and they are from reliable resources. If more information is needed, I would be happy to post it. Thank you. User:Cspies87 —Preceding undated comment added 02:47, 28 April 2011 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:29, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:47, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lack of notability. Keb25 (talk) 23:59, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please, just check out Free Grass Union on youtube ... I think you'll like what you hear. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.71.51.16 (talk) 23:00, 8 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Sorry, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and things are included because they have achieved notability. The article creator said "This page was created for informational purposes" which is okay IF the topic is notable. The band will have to promote themselves elsewhere and after they become notable they will be eligible for a Wikipedia article. See also WP:PROMO and WP:NOTMYSPACE. Good luck. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 17:50, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.