Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Haven (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep (Non-admin closure). No delete votes, nomination withdrawn. Anarchangel (talk) 20:51, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Free Haven
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lack of secondary sources fails GNG. Notability is not inherited (from Tor (anonymity network)). Articles for deletion/Free Haven was not closed. Widefox ; talk 10:42, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nom several secondary sources on the project. Feel free to speedy close. Widefox ; talk 18:25, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 2 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Does pass GNG. Article was in a pretty poor state when AfDed, to be sure. I'm in the process of improving it, however, and not yet done. Does not need to inherit notability from Tor, but the fact that it developed Tor doesn't hurt. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  05:22, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Good work, WP:HEYMANN met, withdrawn. Widefox ; talk 18:25, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.