Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Wood Post (4th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep per WP:SK and WP:DELAFD: "It can be disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hope of getting a different outcome."  In this case, the nominator has made the same nomination 4 times in 3 months. Andrew (talk) 08:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Free Wood Post
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Can we just reach a consensus on this damn thing already? Three AFD's have closed as "no consensus" on the verge that people can't agree whether repeatedly being cited by Snopes or a few scattered mentions elsewhere equal reliable coverage. I say no. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:33, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep per WP:SK section 2. I voted to delete in the last AfD but after three no decisions in roughly two months it is time for the nom to accept that the community is not of one mind on this one and drop the stick. I operate on the three strikes rule. You get three swings with the bat. If you can't get a hit after three swings, and the basic facts of the case haven't changed, then it's time to move on. We have reached the point where this is a vexatious nomination. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:43, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  01:27, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 01:28, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 01:28, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep per WP:SK section 2. This has been nominated for deletion four times within a period of a little over two months. These nominations are excessive, and I think that it has already been thoroughly demonstrated that there is no consensus to delete this article. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:29, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * and : You both clearly missed that the last AFD was closed as WP:NPASR. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * There have been three "No consensuses" within a period of two months. Yes, no consensuses closed as NPASR can be re-nominated, but in this situation I believe it has been demonstrated that there is no support for a delete. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep - 4 times in the space of one year ... I suggest the nominator WP:DROPTHESTICK and moves on .... Since my last quick closure ended up with me at teh dramah boards I won't close this but suggest an admin does!. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  02:51, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep on same grounds as above three !votes. We have limited resources, perma-AfDs are not a good idea.  Try again in a year if you must.--Milowent • hasspoken  02:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.