Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Worlds League


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Keeper |  76  15:21, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Free Worlds League

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Very bloated cruft article, written almost entirely in-universe in style, uses two BattleTech sourcebooks (primary sources) as the sole references and does not establish notability. Tagged for cleanup since 2008 and never improved. Delete/redirect to BattleTech.

Additionally, I nominate the following related articles.
 * - almost exactly the same issues (though shorter)
 * - again nearly identical issues; cites three sources, one expired, one is a fan wiki, and one is a fan page
 * - tagged unsourced and notability in 2008, in-universe in 2010

There are a slew of other articles in the same vein (e.g. Federated Suns, etc), but many of them were not tagged for cleanup until recently. I would consider them equally worthy of removal but have not listed them due to the more recent cleanup tags.

Some guy (talk) 09:03, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete massive dump of in-universe trivia extremely unlikely to ever be reliably sourced. A merge of some kind might be possible, but the insurmountable core problem is that this is fansite material rather than encyclopedia material. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  20:59, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - As these seem to be reliable, if not notable pages, I copied them to wikialpha.org for preservation. If they get deleted, people can edit them there. Mathewignash (talk) 01:28, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. As it stands, it doesn't belong here. If anyone sees it as a useful redirect to another article where it is mentioned that would be fine. --Michig (talk) 08:41, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.