Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free air release technique


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete Jtkiefer  T - 21:05, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Free air release technique
quasi-neologism Ifnord 04:38, 20 October 2005 (UTC)


 * I originally thought this just needed sources but on googling I found only one reference - and that was two guys giggling on a board about fart jokes. Ifnord 04:38, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable enough, or at all? Also may contain incorrect information -Andrew 04:55, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Joke or gag. OED shows that fart has been in use since Chaucer used it in the year 1386. &spades;DanMS 05:17, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, Chaucer probably did fart in the year 1386, but I actually meant he used the word in 1386. DanMS 05:20, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm gonna jump on the bandwagon and say delete. freshgavin  ΓΛĿЌ  06:58, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and do it F.A.S.T. Oyvind 12:03, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article is no more than Flatus Advanced by Rectal Transport. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:29, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Tho' ye subjoct be but a fart, yet will this tedious sink of learning pondrously phillosophize. Sam Clemens 23:29, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as a clever but useless jape. - Sensor 00:20, 21 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.