Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free knowledge

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this  page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was no consensus. Too many deletes to say there's a consensus to userfy. Too many userfies to say there's a consensus to delete. Clearly it should be kept in some form so I am being bold and userfying. But hey, that's just me, not a binding decision. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 20:31, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Free knowledge
While I support the idea (and wouldn't mind seeing something like this in the WP namespace), this is self-promotional (site name and user name of author match) and non-encyclopedic. MikeJ9919 00:24, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Ad coupled with original research/essay. I think all of us wish him success, but delete. Geogre 03:44, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Personal essay. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:27, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy. the wub (talk) 07:54, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Original reseach/ad. - Etacar11 16:54, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy. Great ideas... q;-) Beta m (talk)
 * Userfy as previous voters. Thryduulf 23:08, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - self promotion, original research/essay. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 23:12, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete copyvio from drini &#9742; 02:45, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment by closer: On inspection, this proved to be a correctly labelled mirror of the Wikipedia article. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 20:31, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy. JamesBurns 11:34, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.