Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freedom Games


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Freedom Games

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Seems to fail WP:NCORP. Gameindustry.biz (GIBiz) is the only reliable source covering the company, and it is an interview. While the company may have released one or two notable games or hosted several showcases, notability is not inherited. So far no independent secondary sources discuss the company's history in a significant manner. OceanHok (talk) 05:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies. OceanHok (talk) 05:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Sourcing is a collection of passing mentions in connection to one or two games the company released. As OceanHok correctly points out, the only source that could be considered in-depth (or merely non-passing) is an interview done mere weeks after the company's creation. I reckong the page was already deleted last year, though I cannot recall the exact circumstances. The sourcing situation has not improved since then. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 12:54, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and other notes. Andrevan @ 23:47, 23 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.