Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freedom Through Christ Prison Ministry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:51, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Freedom Through Christ Prison Ministry

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Though it's received some local coverage around a recent controversy. This organization lacks the significant coverage in reliable 3rd party sources needed to meet WP:ORG. RadioFan (talk) 12:28, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * DELETE- This is simply not notable. There are multiple prison ministries. There are multiple unverified assertions made in this article. --MJHankel (talk) 14:48, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete While prison ministries might be notable on the whole, this particular one doesn't appear to rise to the level of notability required here. Its received some media coverage but that was more around controversy surrounding prison ministries than this specific group.  Article seems a but WP:COATRACKy as well. RadioFan (talk) 15:03, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete 3 passing mentions in gnews hardly cuts it. LibStar (talk) 06:43, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:13, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete There is not enough here to establish notability in and of itsself.Slatersteven (talk) 15:40, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - insufficient coverage in reliable sources to demonstrate notability. ukexpat (talk) 17:22, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Would greatly appreciate your patience to fully develop this entry. This organization reaches literally thousands of inmates and is becoming more well known. --Busterthedog (talk) 2:08, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * That reads like a crystal argument. Its going to be well known. That is not a reason to keep the artciel.Slatersteven (talk) 15:37, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.