Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freedom and Justice Party (Bolivia)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 06:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Freedom and Justice Party (Bolivia)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Has been unsourced for nearly two decades. No evidence of notability per WP:NORG. AusLondonder (talk) 17:35, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics,  and Bolivia. AusLondonder (talk) 17:35, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Support and we shouldn't stop here. There are several articles about political parties that should be deleted for the same reason. Charles Essie (talk) 20:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * We really have no need of more research-free nominations and deletion rationales. Instead, we need people to do the research before coming to AFD.  That's what the unsourced article drive is about: looking for sources.  You show no evidence of looking for sources in this rationale.  That hasn't helped the encyclopaedia one iota.  Uncle G (talk) 09:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Disappointing you characterise my nomination in this way when as you say below no sources exist. Having crappy one paragraph articles about micro-parties that haven't been updated in 22 years is not my definition of helping the encyclopedia. AusLondonder (talk) 11:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Agreed, I'm working on weeding out some of these awful articles about clearly non-notable political parties (most of which haven't been updated in at least twenty years). Unfortunately many were created with zero sources by editors who believe all political parties are inherently notable. AusLondonder (talk) 11:43, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:23, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I looked in the same handbook where I found documented in depth.  It doesn't have this party, by either English or Spanish names.  Looking for anything else, after eliminating the Egyptian party of the same name (in Spanish as well), turns up pretty much nothing.  ISBN 9781107145948 gives this a total of two words: "unsuccessful (flop)". Uncle G (talk) 09:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete 3% of the vote and zero candidates two decades ago, isn't notable. The sources used are trivial coverage. I don't find anything further we can use. Oaktree b (talk) 00:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.