Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freefoto.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 14:44, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Freefoto.com

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Reason No pages link to this article. It reads like an advertisement and is probably not notable enough to merit an entry. TheOtherSiguy (talk) 23:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's not blatant advertising and gets a ton of ghits and has been online for ten years, but it's not notable. No third party sources covering the site in detail can be found.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 23:41, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Gary King (talk) 10:05, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty of magazines and text books recommend this site. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Service referenced by a great number of on-net and printed guides as recommendation for high quality photos free of charge for non-commercial usage. Added only one reference to the article due to time constraint. Neozoon 00:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Phil Bridger, I believe that the abundance of refs available should satisfy WP:WEB in this case. RFerreira (talk) 22:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.