Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freelance Talents


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  02:58, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Freelance Talents

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No independent reliable sources. Does not meet WP:CORP or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 08:32, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  09:29, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  09:29, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:56, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Can't see any good independent sources. Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 12:45, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Published books and journals by this publisher listed on google. Some of the database references are non-trivial and list of books, works by this organization in detail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomar99 (talk • contribs) 06:09, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:28, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of notability. The references added here by the article's creator don't add much to the discussion—the comic-book database and writers.net are both user-generated sites.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:57, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable, barely. Also !voted same at Articles for deletion/Indian Comics Fandom. Prhartcom (talk) 23:40, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as still nothing suggesting the necessary notability improvements. SwisterTwister   talk  05:14, 28 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.