Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freeorder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Dakota 17:28, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Freeorder

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability, very few hits on Google, and the term is not found in online dictionary sources Guroadrunner 06:13, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - this article has been tagged for a while and is still totally incomprehensible, at least to me. Feeeshboy 06:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: The fact that it essentially asks the reader to find some reference material and find out for yourself defeats the purpose of Wikipedia. It's entirely unsourced and the information that I do find isn't much better.  Seicer  (talk) (contribs) 06:59, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as un-sourced and generally incomprehensible explanation of an obscure neologism. SkierRMH 08:39, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 *  Weak delete. Yeah, what the heck? The onus is on the original author to ascertain his sources of his article. If he can't be bothered to find the exact source himself, then I can't be bothered to find it for him. Bi 09:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * And it's not notable too. Bi 09:39, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I can't even figure out what this is supposedly about. ObtuseAngle 04:48, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete No context, no decipherable content, indistinguishable from a hoax. most Ghits are mispellings from restaurant websites. Wintermut3 08:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Spontaneous order. It's a "neologism," if a word invented in 1970 can be said to be neo.  Leif Smith is apparently one of very few people who use it.—Carolfrog 09:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete There is only one sentence which supposedly says what freeorder is. Unfortunately, it is incomprehensible. I tend to Speedy Delete as per A7 (no assertion of notability) --Rimshots 20:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.