Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freesat box


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:46, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Freesat box

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not a manual. The article is a mix of this and WP:OR. Ironholds (talk) 18:16, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete It is covering the same ground as Freesat, except is a considerably poorer article and offers nothing new. Consider redirecting to Freesat. --Pontificalibus (talk) 20:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * (ec)*Redirect to Freesat. The technical details of the receivers are handled there already without the how-to sections and the OR. But "Freesat box" is used commonly enough to describe the equipment to remain as a simple redirect.  FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 20:35, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. No content. Greg Tyler (t &bull; c) 10:25, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems to be someone's personal playground - blanked with the comment "to be re written". Even before blanking, had no content that wasn't already covered in Freesat. Was clearly created to spamvertise e-book websites (see Talk:Freesat box) No value in keeping. Bonusballs (talk) 12:30, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.