Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freespeechstore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy deleted as an attack page created by user blocked as an impostor. Gamaliel 21:27, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Freespeechstore
NN website, vanity article... Kareeser|Talk! 03:26, 26 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Should be deleted, has no real purpose other than tweaking Scoville. Duskglow 03:29, 26 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Except it's true. Babs Schwartz posts on FSS all the time, unless Scoville is posting as her? Given that he should be at least a footnote under Barbara... Note Bab's is his only real supporter. &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by 169.196.244.219 (talk &bull; contribs).


 * then make him a footnote under Barbara, and open that can of worms instead. This page has no legitimate purpose, as is obvious by the first cut of the page, which I altered to be a little less inflammatory. Duskglow 03:40, 26 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Alexa 854,212, which is in the gutter by my book. Ruby 03:54, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ruby. -- Nacon Kantari  e |t||c|m 03:56, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, speedy if possible as non-notable website and partially classifies as an attack page. SYCTHOS talk  00:15, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Agree with the speedy deletion. And to anonymous commenter above, wikipedia is not a discussion forum. Set up a google group if that's what you want. 71.128.23.212 03:38, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Ditto. He's even less notable than he is angry and threatening. --maru (talk) contribs 17:06, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, without shame. -- Andy Saunders 21:20, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and allow others affected by a true internet k00k to discuss their experiences. Anyone favoring deletion has no idea what Scoville and the freespeechstore have done to many innocent people. THey should be ashamed of themselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rscoville (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.