Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freeze and Thaw on The Gatineau River


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 12:30, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Freeze and Thaw on The Gatineau River

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Original interpretation of unsourced data. Written as to suggest the author collected the data. The subject is somewhat trivial. Alksub 22:09, 15 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - WP:OR. The thing that amazes me is how the river knows when it's December 25th and April 6th.  WebHamste r  22:17, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above, maybe some elements about the freeze and thaw maybe mentionned to the main article (if sourced).--JForget 22:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even if the article wasn't complete original research, what would its importance be?  The main article on Gatineau River doesn't say if there's any impact to shipping or other river usage when the river freezes.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 23:46, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - The article really doesn't establish that this particular phenomenon is notable for any reason. Even if sources can be found suggesting that the freezing and thawing of the river affects its usage or something, I think it still only deserves a mention in the main article, rather than its own article.--Danaman5 00:26, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, it sounds like an interesting, ongoing school project. However, there are no sources and no establishment of why the freezing of the river is important and needs its own article. Nuttah68 08:03, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge it or dunk it in Gatineau River. It definitely isn't worthy of its own article.  If there's a freeze and thaw of the Amazon River or the Congo River, that might be notable.  Mandsford 16:51, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's original research. Note that there's nothing to merge once the original research is removed. -- Whpq 17:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.