Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fremantle Chocolate Factory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Lear's Fool 06:31, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Fremantle Chocolate Factory

 * – ( View AfD View log )

fails WP:CORP. the awards lack national recognition. still lacks third party coverage. . LibStar (talk) 02:52, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —ManicSpider (talk) 02:57, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom. Article is unsourced and is little more than a long, promotional list of unsourced awards. Ghits do not return any reliable independent sources. --Kudpung (talk) 03:54, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, then. All I had intended by changing tags was that this be reviewed a little more closely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I nominated this for prod deletion about a year ago but the article creator removed the nomination. There's still no evidence of any notability per WP:ORG. Nick-D (talk) 09:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I nominated this for prod deletion about a year ago but the article creator removed the nomination. There's still no evidence of any notability per WP:ORG. Nick-D (talk) 09:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete- Lacks coverage in reliable sources to establish notability.  They do appear in toruism guide books, but these are simply directory entries without any actual coverage about them as an attraction. -- Whpq (talk) 16:51, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.