Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/French Dip (sexual)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 01:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

French Dip (sexual)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreferenced alleged sexual act. A little Googling suggests that this is nonsense. The Anome 14:21, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nom, the article has been lacking refs since Oct. 2006. It seems like WP:NONSENSE to me.   Plm  209 (talk to me • contribs) 14:35, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Though the act is real, I'm not sure if that is the accurate name. If some sources can be presented, then I'm all for keeping, but if no sources can be presented in a timely manner, then we should delete. -- s u m n j i m  talk with me·changes 15:05, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsourced slang generally is not encyclopedic.  Even if some sources can be dredged up it's not likely this will be more than a dicdef, and since Wikipedia is not urban dictionary ..  Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 16:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced neologism, dictionary definition at best. Edison 17:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as this is not even notable as a neologism, see . Bearian 20:23, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 00:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Au revoir made up crap.  RFerreira 05:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:SNOW - non -notable  Sala Skan  11:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.