Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/French Horn Rebellion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America1000 22:45, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

French Horn Rebellion

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article includes Facebook, AllMusic, SoundCloud, YouTube, and Vimeo as sources, all of which fail WP:IRS. The remaining two are good but there is simply not enough outside of it online. WP:MILL. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:25, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. The Guardian is not chopped liver, and to have been featured in Andy Warhol's Interview magazine indicates it is among "some of the world's biggest celebrities, artists, musicians, and creative thinkers" (what Wikipedia says). That's no high school garage band. -- do  ncr  am
 * Keep - I found a couple of 2013 articles: Rebel Rock and Indie Pop and Dance s Headline Milk Festival via Questia (subscription required) in the Sarasota Herald Tribune that mention this band being the headliner at the Harvey Milk Festival in Sarasota. From 2014 is the sfgate (Hearst Communications) review of the band style. This article was just started.  I think we should give them time to develop the article. — Maile  (talk) 00:08, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment – Note that per WP:NEXIST, "notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article". North America1000 20:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:NEXIST was what I meant by "simply not enough outside of it online". But nevertheless, it seems an adequate amount of reliable, significant coverage was found, so I'm withdrawing my nomination. --Mr. Guye (talk) 22:43, 4 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.