Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fresher Foods Ltd.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. While some coverage has been presented, the consensus is that the coverage is not sufficient for the purposes of the relevant notability guidelines. Mkativerata (talk) 19:54, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Fresher Foods Ltd.

 * – ( View AfD View log  • )

WP:CORP. Organisation does not seem to be notable, and is unsourced. Only wikilinks are from Fresher Potato Chips, a brand of potato chips they manufacture (this article has no incoming links at all) and a hatnote at "Freshman" ("Fresher" redirects there).

The company should not have "Ltd." in the title (WP:NCCORP) but it seems makework to move it if it is to be deleted. Si Trew (talk) 05:42, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Delete: Non-notable company.--Karljoos (talk) 09:13, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Delete: Non-notabne company. There is nothing in  the very  short text  that  suggests why  this company  should be important  enough  to  have its own  Wiki  article. It could have probably been speedy  deleted under CSD A7 as an article about an organization (band, club, company, etc.), that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance. --Kudpung (talk) 09:27, 17 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I did consider CSD or PROD but thought on balance it would probably end up at AfD anyway, so might as well come here anyway. There is currently an unrelated merge proposal at Talk:Freshman, to which Fresher redirects,and it's listed in the hatnote at that article. There's also a merge proposal at Talk:Freshman (disambiguation). It's all getting a bit messy so it seemed best to bring it to AfD rather than seem to serve summary justice. Si Trew (talk) 09:33, 17 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete both the company and the product. No indicia of encyclopedic notability. bd2412  T 12:00, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 17 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:CORP scope_creep (talk) 21:22, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not even a significant company by New Zealand's standards. dramatic (talk) 00:08, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: There are actually many different articles that discuss the company, so actually it does pass WP:CORP and it is notable according to Wikipedia guidelines. I suppose this doesn't matter to the people who blindly post "delete". --Teggles (talk) 06:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * As for their significance in New Zealand, they're practically in every supermarket and convenience store, but this is of course irrelevant. --Teggles (talk) 06:58, 19 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete They've been mentioned passingly in a government speech on free trade and have had a round of press out of it. I can find no other secondary sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:09, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * That is enough to establish notability, as per WP:NOTABILITY and WP:CORP. --Teggles (talk) 12:14, 22 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Lack of significant coverage so fails WP:CORP, disagree with Teggles, the bar for WP:Corp is a lot higher than coverage based on press releases and a government speech.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.