Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freshly Squeezed music


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete lack of notability. The two "keep" editors, being contributors to the article, can be seen as having conflict of interest. Furthermore, their arguments are not convincing. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:01, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Freshly Squeezed music

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Though it appears in search results, I am nominating for this reason Freshly Squeezed Music. Greek Legend (talk) 09:13, 30 March 2016 (UTC) blocked sockpuppet Atlantic306 (talk) 18:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment. The wording of the nomination isn't clear, but it is presumably trying to point out that the differently capitalised page Freshly Squeezed Music has been deleted on a number of occasions, including at AFD. --David Biddulph (talk) 09:28, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 30 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - This should be speedy deleted under criteria G4 as this is a recreation of a previously deleted page via an AFD discussion. Mwenzangu (talk) 02:00, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * comment This does not qualify for G4, because the page is substantially different than the version that was deleted. Note that G4 "excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version".  I have not checked the potential notability of the topic.    78.26   (spin me / revolutions) 13:39, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Do Not Delete I do not see how it is not notable enough to be included? Though previous pages have been deleted on this subject, this article not only is very different in it's construction and use of sources, but it also asks (Using Stubs) for more parties to contribute to its completion. The page (Record Label) is linked and mentioned in other approved Wiki Pages: Voodoo Trombone Quartet, Swing Republic, Swingrowers Lodekka, The Correspondents and more. It's Club night 'White Mink' is mention in Electro swing and the sources backing this articles notability include The Independent & Mixmag ( Electroswing770 (talk) 12:47, 1 April 2016 (UTC) )

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:43, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as still questionable for solid independent notability, delete for now at best. SwisterTwister   talk  05:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Subject is only mentioned in passing in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 00:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete - Subject is not only mentioned in passing, if you view the linked artists associated with the label you will see that in every aspect of their activity they mention being signed to the record label Freshly Squeezed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Electroswing770 (talk • contribs) 13:24, 15 April 2016‎ (UTC)
 * comment Please don't try to !vote more than once. - David Biddulph (talk) 14:07, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Do Not Delete - Any Record label of over 10 years standing in the industry these days is notable! joking aside, I also know they just signed a Joint Venture with Island Records (Universal) not yet in the media, but they aren't going away anywhere in the real world any time soon, so they should be represented here too. This is the key label behind the Electro Swing genre as mentioned above. The points re notability above are not that relevant when a label's first job is building the profile of it's artists, not itself! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Copydawg (talk • contribs) 15:40, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:24, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete very questionable for solid independent notability. RS's are little more than mentions. Ludicrously promotional tone isn't in itself a criteria for deletion, but doesn't help! Pincrete (talk) 21:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Searches did not turn up anything to show they pass WP:GNG, only trivial mentions. And actually,, as per WP:DEL4, promotional tone can be a rationale for termination. I think the combo of promotion and lack of notability in this case is a certain recipe for deletion.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:05, 24 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.