Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freshwater library


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  00:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Freshwater library

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete: Fails WP:RS and WP:N.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 23:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete in its current condition. Unencyclopedic. Terrible English. Not clear it is at all notable. If the main author wants to, he could rescue this article and work on it in a sandbox version, securing references and trying to establish notability, it at all possible. Otherwise, it is hard to imagine it belonging on Wikipedia.--Filll (talk) 00:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No hint of notability; no references; unverifiable.  Even without these problems, the article would need a complete, ground-up rewrite to be remotely encyclopedic.  The present version strikes me as being more like a travel guide, albeit a very peculiar one; I cannot begin to surmise why a travel guide (or encyclopedia) would include a site whose only claim to fame appears to be  a "new wheelchair ramp laid in place in 1995[.]"  OlenWhitaker   • talk to me or don't • ♣ ♥ ♠ ♦ 00:55, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, completely fails WP:RS and WP:N – ukexpat (talk) 01:14, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete No Sources, and obiously not notable. Thedjatclubrock :-) (T/C) 01:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable; no references. Luk  suh  02:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete no refs, non-notable public place.  RC-0722 247.5/ 1  02:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - asserts no notability through providing reliable sources independent of the topic. Sephiroth BCR  ( Converse ) 04:11, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.