Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fresible Corporations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SarahStierch (talk) 16:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Fresible Corporations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

CSD contested. No indication that company (Nigerian multinational conglomerate company with 120.000$ revenue and 18 employees) meets WP:CORP.  Dewritech (talk)  12:03, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 24 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  15:40, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:47, 7 June 2013 (UTC)




 * Delete - There's no evidence this corporation even exists. For a conglomerate with such varied interests, $0.12 million USD seems rather paltry for revenues.  The domain for their web site is suspended or expired.  The sourcing provides no coverage in reliable sources.  In chasing down the sources listed in the article, this one would appear to point to the whole thing is a hoax.  It's a press release type posting which ppoints to this SC Magazine article.  The article makes no mention of Fresible, and is infact, about something completely different despite the URL having "oyetayo-fred-appointed-as-ceo-of-fresible-corporations" in the path.  A quick check finds that SC Mag website will acept aything in that path and apepars to go solely based on article ID as substituting "this-is-a-hoax" into the URL works just as well.  -- Whpq (talk) 15:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.