Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FriHost


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete, A1 and A7. Speedy deletion is not biting a newbie. —Cuivi é nen 01:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

FriHost


A newbie was bitten in the hasty deletion of this article, even though a request had been made. While I don't believe everything on Earth is Inherently Notable, I do believe in fair process. This article is certainly a candidate for speedy as it stands, but OTOH, a request should be honored for a few minutes. This AfD is primarily procedural, meant to give the writer a bit of time to improve his article. Denni  talk 00:19, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Fails WP:WEB and meets criteria for db-web and db-empty.Diez2 00:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Nothing there. While I don't advocate biting the newbies, perhaps the newbie should be advised that a seven-word article isn't going to last very long. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  00:45, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.