Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friday Night Live! with Mike Koncan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 00:54, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Friday Night Live! with Mike Koncan

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This television programme/Internet broadcast has no reliable sources demonstrating any notability; although it is impossible to access the organization's website without a password, it seems as though this is a university student-level production using a public access television channel and likely has an infinitesimal audience. Accounting4Taste: talk 18:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

- Please do not delete. I am new to wikipedia but our show is seen each week by hundreds online and thousands more as part of Ryerson University's campus television station, RUtv. Many people use this article to see who will be on the show in the coming weeks... -

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:55, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as wholly sourced to primary sources; no evidence of meeting the Notability guideline. —   pd_THOR  undefined | 20:16, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Seems to be notable only on the Ryerson campus. Wikipedia requires wider significance to establish notability. Maybe something about the program could be added to the Ryerson University article? --MelanieN (talk) 15:42, 2 December 2009 (UTC)MelanieN
 * Notability is only required for separate articles, if this can be merged into the university article, all it needs is verifiability, not even from a third party source if the source is made totally clear. - Mgm|(talk) 09:37, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.