Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fried earth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. X clamation point  03:08, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Fried earth

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete clear promotion of a non-notable work of art by the artist Mayalld (talk) 15:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  15:38, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  15:38, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Highly POV, definite OR, no assertion of importance and borderline "tinfoil hattery."  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:40, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as irrelevant and spammy article and mildly surprise it's not been tagged CSD. WP:SNOW? ~ Excesses ~  (talk) 15:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom...Modernist (talk) 16:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Iner22 (talk) 16:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No attempt to establish notability, very poorly written and the article title is not even mentioned until the last line. HJ Mitchell (talk) 17:39, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Note that the creater is User: Hansdoller, the subject of the article, definite WP:COI. Also, a reminder to the above users, please give a reason for deletion, "per nom" is just filler. We are trying to reach concensus, not vote. Livewireo (talk) 19:56, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.