Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frieda Van Themsche


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP. Rje 13:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Frieda Van Themsche
Bad faith article, trying to create a POV in connection to Hans Van Themsche.1652186 19:13, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm in agreement with the nominator. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 22:00, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. She is a Flemish parliamentarian, so an article about her could be included in wikipedia, but as it stands now, the article is pov and stubby. Intangible 10:50, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I expanded the article from 2 sentences to what I hope is a sufficient stub. Her connection to the shooter is hard to avoid, but verifiable, and, I believe, can be presented in an NPOV way. AnonEMouse 14:27, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I agree that the article is NPOV now, but I still think Frieda is nn. 1652186 16:13, 16 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep parliament members. Stifle (talk) 16:18, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: you know, somewhere I agree, but to be NPOV we then have to include all MPs, i.e. multiple hundres for Belgium alone. 1652186 16:58, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * We include 535 members of the United States Congress some of whom haven't been written about in connection to major crimes. OK, only a few ... but still. . To show what highly notable congress-persons from there qualify, I give you the highly notable Julius W. Blackwell, Richard Biddle, and Jesse Atherton Bynum, from the 26th congress. AnonEMouse 17:13, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Feel free to write those articles. Incidentally, that does not follow from NPOV, or at least not from my reading of it. Stifle (talk) 18:03, 16 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.