Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friedrich Count of Luxburg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Despite the influx of SPAs, the consensus is that, because of the dearth of treatment in reliable, independent secondary sources, the article's subject fails to satisfy the criteria of WP:N. I've also taken into account the opinions expressed in the previous AfD. Deor (talk) 19:51, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Friedrich Count of Luxburg
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Enough has been added to this article since the last AfD that it should have another discussion, but the new material is mainly about the subject's family and ancestors, who already have an article at Counts of Luxburg. There is little information about the subject himself, and what there is is quite unsourced.

The three references are links to a house and a bank once associated with the family, and the pretty but fairly uninformative website of a Panama-based "Fundación de Los Condes de Luxburg". Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED from his ancestors; neither the references nor the other links show the "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" necessary to establish WP:Notability, nor have I found any.

The corresponding article on Spanish Wikipedia has been deleted as No enciclopédico. JohnCD (talk) 11:18, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Not only for that (at least the third time it was deleted) but also for CoI. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 16:31, 18 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. JohnCD (talk) 11:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. JohnCD (talk) 11:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. JohnCD (talk) 11:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - I don't see any evidence this rich guy is notable. I'm sure he's also nice, but he fails WP:GNG. Bearian (talk) 23:21, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable. I checked all references in the article, but are about Castle Luxburg (and not about him) or are self-published. WP:AUTOBIO--Yopie (talk) 14:56, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment A few sources in Spanish have been added recently, but they are only passing mentions and a "collaborative journal" does not look like a reliable source. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 17:33, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Not Delete, the item and you get better and better edited for presentation, and I noticed judge a person for money which should not be so people earn their position is by their actions--Dbianchir (talk) 18:01, 15 August 2014 (UTC) — Dbianchir (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * You are the creater of the article, right? --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 18:04, 15 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Not Delete, the article is well thought out and I see that improved sources and references, I think someone is starting a witch hunt to gain popularity (Yopie)--Marttinm (talk) 18:09, 15 August 2014 (UTC) — Marttinm (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Obvious keepI see the article was corrected and improved, sr. Yopie read this Speedy keep--Highlander lion (talk) 18:56, 15 August 2014 (UTC) — Highlander lion (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete Article says almost nothing about him, although it makes much mention of his family and family members. None of the references is about him, and the first one doesn't mention him at all, it's just a photo of their houses. Unless some real references can be found, there is no evidence of notability here. LaMona (talk) 01:52, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note for closing admin Accounts Marttinm,Dbianchir and Highlander lion are single-purpose accounts.--Yopie (talk) 19:06, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note for closing admin sr Yopie, if you do not like the way I see my this article must comply with to give their opinion and not believe the highest authority in wikipedia you like all of us is a contributor and we all want to be the best wikipedia, seems to be a political enemy of Count more objective and neutral.--Highlander lion (talk) 22:10, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * You should better use Google Translate. It gives more acceptable results. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 22:16, 18 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Potential keep as a person who provides services and training aids to people in need of Venezuela that could be noticeable.--Racanno (talk) 22:29, 18 August 2014 (UTC) — Racanno (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Welcome to WP, Racanno. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 22:33, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.