Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friend Like That


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Appears delete arguments have been invalidated by charting of the song. lifebaka++ 13:20, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Friend Like That

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unremarkable song. Declined prod. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 12:18, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:27, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - notable song, by a notable band. This single received significant airplay on radio as well. Current article is very stubbish, but that is not a reason to delete --T-rex 00:40, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It's creator is a genre troll, by the way. Keeps changing genres without consensus to suit his POV. If the song hasn't charted then it shouldn't be here. Delete. Scarian Call me Pat!  21:51, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I think every music related article on wikipedia is bothered by genre trolls. this is not a reason to delete --T-rex 00:22, 4 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, I can't see anything about "significant airplay". Punkmorten (talk) 10:02, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note - I'm in the process of improving the article and adding references. I think this song does assert notability, since it has received some reliable coverage and charted within its genre, I believe. This might not turn out to be true, but I'll see what I can do with adding sources and info about notability.  Jamie ☆ S93  15:30, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅. I believe the song's notability is now established with the addition of chart info and referencing. Thanks,  Jamie ☆ S93  17:43, 2 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, I'm relisting the article due to the addition of references.  Wizardman  22:38, 3 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. The song meets WP:MUSIC guidelines in that it charted and, although it is on a more niche chart, got all the way to #3. Rwiggum  (Talk /Contrib ) 16:54, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.