Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friends of FundeCruz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. SwisterTwister: that's a mind boggling argument there, I can't parse what you're trying to say. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:58, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Friends of FundeCruz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No longer exists according to Charity Commission. No evidence of notability Rathfelder (talk) 13:52, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:21, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ecuador-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:21, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete  no significant third party coverage to meet WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 11:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete A non-notable charity for which the best I found were passing mentions ,. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORGDEPTH --Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as there's nothing minimally convincing of any actual universal notability, only a a local with of course granted signs of any expected and local coverage but still nothing actually convincing of the needed notability solidity and improvements. SwisterTwister   talk  17:34, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.