Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frightmare (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. PhilKnight (talk) 08:08, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Frightmare (band)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:MUSIC, no reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 20:35, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete the lot, fails notability per WP:MUSIC.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 21:01, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all: Fails WP:MUSIC. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 23:00, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 04:58, 13 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - meets MUSIC, has been a subject of a publication in the Decibel (magazine). Óðinn (talk) 07:40, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I question that Razorback Records has a "roster of performers, many of which are notable" when articles on most of the signed artists are either redlinked or up for deletion, and in fact when the label article itself is in AfD for failing WP:CORP. Luinfana (talk) 07:54, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Nowhere does it say that a band's label must meet WP's notability standards. And there is that magazine article... Óðinn (talk) 07:59, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, it says exactly that in WP:MUSIC, which you referenced. The magazine article on its own is not enough to establish the band as notable; see C1: multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable. Luinfana (talk) 08:06, 13 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:25, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:25, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete One magazine article does not "multiple non-trivial published works" make. Fails WP:MUSIC. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony  12:26, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete All per nom. Rwiggum  (Talk /Contrib' ) 19:21, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: sadly, all three don't appear to be notable, as per WP:MUSIC. JamesBurns (talk) 05:21, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.