Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frisian is not german


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy userfy. Recognized as non-encyclopedic content, this can be moved to user space Tikiwont (talk) 10:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Frisian is not german

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is not encyclopledic content. Koert van der Veer (talk) 09:52, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

I must agree. We must, however, but an end at the confusion once and for all, don't you agree with me on that? What do you suggest me to do? Last king of Frisia (talk) 09:54, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * First of all, I suggest letting this article be deleted.
 * Secondly, I think it is unreasonable to demand that people who don't know a language to identify it correctly. I even think it is worth some prais if they guess the language familly correct (germanic). Don't be offended - just correct the error. I promise you'll be a happier person... Koert van der Veer (talk) 09:59, 1 October 2008 (UTC) (btw, I'm a native dutch speaker myself. I recognize the frustration, I just don't let it ruin my day)

Ok then. I am a Happy Person. i raised awareness to this urgent problem that is good enough fornow. Last king of Frisia (talk) 10:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Frisian languages would be the right place. – sgeureka t•c 10:04, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Delete -- Flewis (talk) 10:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong delete WP:NOTSOAPBOX. – sgeureka t•c 10:04, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.