Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fritz Guy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:20, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Fritz Guy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seemingly non-notable academic. Nothing about his academic career seems to pass WP:NPROF. He does have some written works, as can be seem by the long list in the article, but there's no evidence from what I could find that any of what he's wrote had any major impact in academia or religion outside of Seventh-Adventist circles. It seems like Seventh-day Adventist sources are the only things he's been published in. So he fails the notability standards for authors. The article doesn't even cite any references and it seems to mainly serve the purpose of being a glorified listing of his published works and links to other articles related to Adventistism. Adamant1 (talk) 23:08, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:16, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:16, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:16, 18 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete his significance as an author is not evident and he does not seem to be the subject of WP:RSs.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:23, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly fails the notability guidelines for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:42, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as does not pass the criteria for WP:NPROF, WP:AUTHOR or WP:NBIO. -Lopifalko (talk) 20:51, 25 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.