Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fritz Richter III


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Fritz Richter III

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Person does not appear notable. Only reference is from firm he works for. WP editor may be related to subject based on username. Bahooka (talk) 21:15, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:A7. No evidence of notablity at all. There are thousands of attorneys with equal or superior notability who don't have (and shouldn't have) Wikipedia articles. Also likely WP:COI. Sundayclose (talk) 23:00, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 21:33, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 21:33, 11 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm going to have to say delete on this one, unless the creator or somebody can come up with some real sources. The guy just doesn't appear notable. White Arabian Filly  ( Neigh ) 22:43, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per nom. JTtheOG (talk) 04:20, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:BIO - Insufficient coverage in neutral independent sources. I did a Highbeam search which gave no results. I found two mentions in newsitems on google news. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 07:22, 17 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.