Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frivolous political party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 02:09, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Frivolous political party

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A 100% original research, created in these early days of wikipedia when everything was possible. Joke political parties do exist, but I don't see any scholarly researc of them. The references is the articles are just links to cases of individual parties, not to studies about them. THerefore the whole article is WP:SYNTH at best. -No.Altenmann >t 15:18, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:40, 13 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per nominating statement, purely original research.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 00:42, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 02:46, 21 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete As nominated. No sources for the topic itself. Just examples. BayShrimp (talk) 04:24, 21 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - yeah, those aren't really sources in the WP:RS or WP:V sense.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 05:08, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. and the above comments. --Jersey92 (talk) 21:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.