Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frog Education


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  04:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Frog Education

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This company does not appear to be notable. A news search turns up local news mentions of company employees serving on local civic organisations, a couple of glancing mentions that the company exists, and that's about it. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:03, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: no verifiable claims of notability. –– FormalDude  talk  13:30, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of any SIGCOV from reliable-independent sources or claim of notability in the article. Brayan ocaner (talk) 23:58, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't follow WP:CORPDEPTH. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:14, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree with the above. I cannot see evidence of notability or significant coverage of the subject which would merit there being an article. Dunarc (talk) 20:33, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: An article originally created by a user with a declared company connection and subsequently developed by a couple of WP:SPAs. The provided references to fastest-growing lists are insufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH. I have added one reference (an assessment of the Frog VLE in Malaysia); aside from that, I can see a local paper interview with the company's co-founder, but overall I am not seeing evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 16:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.