Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frogball


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:20, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Frogball

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Wikipedia is not for made up things -- Σ  talk  contribs  03:58, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - The subject clearly does not meet the general notability guideline. VQuakr (talk) 04:03, 1 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable game with no evidence of coverage in reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 04:15, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 05:54, 1 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable per the general notability guidelines; shows, yet again, why the criteria for speedy deletion needs some kind of "unambiguous WP:NOT violation" reason—this shouldn't be cluttering up AfD but should be in CSD's remit. —Tom Morris (talk)
 * Redirect to Frog Baseball (Beavis and Butt-head)? Powers T 12:06, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * No relevance there that I can see. No frogs, for one thing. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:02, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * No frogs where? Anyway, it seems "Frogball" might be an attempted search term for someone who only half-remembers the Beavis & Butt-head episode.  Powers T 15:20, 1 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:MADEUP Andy Dingley (talk) 15:02, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete clear madeup case. Hobit (talk) 02:59, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.