Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frogfoot (South Africa)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 15:50, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Frogfoot (South Africa)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

It exists, but doesn't even assert why it is notable. Sources I could find didn't show it either. Boleyn (talk) 15:46, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:51, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:51, 25 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - I think that this article is pretty important, under the fact that they are the 3rd biggest fiber infrastructure provider to consumers in South Africa. The notability is not great, but most notable sources are well know locally including MyBroadband, IOL and respective ISPs. TapticInfo (talk) 19:17, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, featured in local well known press in South Africa News24,IOL, mybroadband, George Herald, this suggests the article is of importance. Plenty other reliable sources can be found through a WP:BEFORE. -Xclusivzik (talk) 20:43, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 'Keep Per above, There are good number of refs present to qualify for GNG. Jaysonsands (talk) 08:57, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Per nom. the refs satisfy the rules of wikipedia --Rupertdonovan (talk) 00:19, 28 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.