Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/From Bed to Worse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of The Cleveland Show episodes. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:22, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

From Bed to Worse

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Unreferenced with little or no real world relevance. No evidence that this episode is particularly notable. Consists entirely of plot and trivia. Corporation Cart (talk) 07:59, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect: to List of The Cleveland Show episodes. Joe Chill (talk) 21:47, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - Article can easilly, and appropriately be expanded, both in content and references. Gage (talk) 01:32, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Prove it. Joe Chill (talk) 01:59, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - No need. I've proven myself by expanding many articles related to Family Guy, for example, Dog Gone (Family Guy). Gage (talk) 02:06, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * There is a need because not every article is the same. Joe Chill (talk) 14:09, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * User:GageSkidmore has resorted to votestacking in order to sway the outcome of this discussion. --78.34.248.43 (talk) 01:51, 22 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete unreferenced as nom states. anyone who says "No need. I've proven myself" needs to put up or shut up. source it or gtfo. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
 * Comment - Done. Gage (talk) 22:24, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to List of The Cleveland Show episodes. Despite being expanded there is still little evidence that this episode is notable. A handful of review words and ratings do not indicate context or the impact a work of fiction has had in the real world. Fails WP:EPISODE and does not meet WP:WAF. 121.45.222.238 (talk) 02:56, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - This user has two contributions, makes me think of Sock puppetry. Gage (talk) 03:43, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * A accusation of bad faith like that is rich coming from someone who has been canvassing in this very AfD, then reacted by removing another user's comment. --78.34.194.95 (talk) 06:47, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete we can't have a wikipedia page for every episode of every TV show, that would be madness. Sure, there are particularly famous examples (Fonzie jumping the shark for example) but by all accounts, this is just a standard episode of a standard TV show, with all respect to the fans of the show. There's nothing special about it at all.Callivert (talk) 08:36, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep episode articals of animated series are difrent from the real life there's more production and more info and notability.-- Saint Pedrolas J. Hohohohohoh merry christmas 21:36, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. An episode is an eposide. There is no inherent notability just because it is animated. There is no evidence that this episode is notable. Corporation Cart (talk) 10:35, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep All ready real world reviews and more real world "stuff" can be added. C T J F 8 3  chat 20:42, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Nota bene: This vote has been canvassed. (See Canvassing) --78.34.248.43 (talk) 01:47, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, one vote strongly influences this discussion, my apologies. Gage (talk) 01:57, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * This is not a vote. Consensus is not a majority vote and Wikipedia is not a democracy. ShipFan (talk) 03:30, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * In no way was I suggesting that, just a misused word. Gage (talk) 03:35, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Votestacking is widely frowned upon and you should never do it. --78.34.194.95 (talk) 06:45, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge and redirect. I am a fan of the show but I agree there is nothing special about this episode. ShipFan (talk) 03:30, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge etc as above. An individual episode of any show is not usually so notable as to merit its own article.  Sussexonian (talk) 00:56, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.