Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/From Brush and Stone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  00:36, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

From Brush and Stone

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable new release by two notable artists; no sourcing and serious NPOV problems of the "Gee, these guys did such good work, isn't it nice they've got a record out, even if nobody noticed" sort. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  02:08, 2 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:NALBUMS. But rip out the POV Production section... the first Production section that is.  Not the second.  Dismas |(talk) 02:15, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep in agreement with Dismas above. The nominator's deletion rationale is more an indictment of the article's quality, rather than the album's notability. I am going to clean things up a bit. We could definitely use more sources, however, if anyone wants to help out. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 14:47, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * If it matters, today's "anonymous" edits to the article were done by me but I didn't realize that I was not signed in. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 14:48, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.