Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/From Me to You & Only You (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to A-Reece. The only "delete" vote was expressed weakly and the sole "keep" noted contentious sources. Article history will remain if better sources can be found. Bungle (talk • contribs) 19:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

From Me to You & Only You
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

This barely meets our notability guidelines. No chart placings and sources are unreliable Xclusivzik (talk) 15:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:25, 28 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Weak delete Needs better sourcing, but wouldn't take much to improve. Take to draft? Lirazelf (talk) 16:44, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:20, 28 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep: The sources indicated in the previous AfD are reliable. Too bad no one bothered to improve the article and add them after the previous AfD was closed. I also found a couple more reliable sources which talk about the album: and . It's also discussed in this listicle. That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:NALBUM.  ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Your first source is a four-line introduction to a link to stream the album, the second is a collective blog that doesn't pass WP:RS. Of the sources in the previous AfD, Unorthodox Reviews is also a blog... I'm not sure about the other two at the moment. Richard3120 (talk) 14:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 14:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to A-Reece. The sources are unreliable, there is no significant coverage in multiple reliable independent sources, plus no chartings, certifications, or accolades. Clearly fails WP:NALBUMS. -- Ashley yoursmile!  12:04, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to A-Reece. Sources are unreliable. Not much information for a standalone article. If this page is re-created, then it should be protected. HĐ (talk) 13:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.