Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/From Out of the Rain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. This isn't going to be deleted. A discussion on whether to keep or redirect is one of editorial nature and can continue on the Talk page Star   Mississippi  02:46, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

From Out of the Rain

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not every TV episode needs an article, especially one that there are no RS reviews for. This TV series doesn't have an individual article for every episode, so that arguement for inclusion is invalid. In addition, the plot is already covered in the article on the show. Donald D23  talk to me  15:16, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy, Television,  and United Kingdom.  Donald D23   talk to me  15:16, 29 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete Redirect per below unless sources other than standard reviews can be found...but the article's been tagged for needing them since 2014, and that evidently hasn't led to the issue being addressed. DonIago (talk) 15:38, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep IGN, DigitalSpy give two RS reviews, meets GNG. Jclemens (talk) 04:52, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Do you have any sources other than reviews? DonIago (talk) 06:19, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I didn't bother to look; two RS reviews establishes GNG and is sufficient justification for a standalone article. Do you need my help to Google more? My first trick is to add the series name ("Torchwood") to the full title of the episode. Hope that helps. Jclemens (talk) 02:28, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Torchwood episodes. (I have a feeling this could be expanded into a perfectly fine article, but right now, it lacks enough sourcing).--Gen. Quon[Talk] 21:19, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment, a REDIRECT to the series or season page would be a viable WP:ATD Donald D23   talk to me  20:54, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect or weak keep. Two reliable reviews found by User:Jclemens do seem to meet the minimum required by GNG as I understand it (two in-depth, reliable treatments). But none of this is present in the article, which is just an unreferenced plot summary like now, so a redirect to the list of episodes is fine too unless someone fixes the article by adding those sources. Until that happens, the article does not meet our policies and a soft delete via redirecting might be a temporary solution until someone decides to make it policy-compliant (If kept but not improved, I suggest tagging this with sources exist). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:20, 7 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.