Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Froydis Ree Wekre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 08:32, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Froydis Ree Wekre

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This orphaned, rarely edited, rarely viewed and barely referenced article fails to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Only one reference link actually works, and the article veers into puffery territory. Fiedorczuk (talk) 14:38, 5 August 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:27, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:28, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 03:28, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Appears to be a review of Gravity is Light Today by Froydis Ree Wekre and Roger Bobo in duffbeerforme (talk) 12:25, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. "Orphaned, rarely edited, rarely viewed" are utterly irrelevant to whether an article should be deleted, as is the statement that the article "veers into puffery territory" (the only thing remotely resembling puffery is the single word "renowned", which would take far less time to change by editing than it took to create this AfD discussion). As regards sources showing notability, all that is needed to find them is to click on the word "books" in the nomination, which finds many reliable sources such as this profile. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:35, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep co-principal in a major symphony orchestra is notable     DGG ( talk ) 03:49, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * 160.39.212.104 (talk) 01:20, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete- not notable. The profile link as per above- this profile is pretty poor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by QuietCountry25 (talk • contribs) 12:18, 12 August 2010 (UTC)  — QuietCountry25 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Weak keep A marginal case, but her book being translated into several languages, and having been President of the International Horn Society both seem (just) sufficient. Bondegezou (talk) 16:26, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * How are those things relevant to notability? 160.39.212.104 (talk) 01:20, 13 August 2010 (UTC) — 160.39.212.104 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.