Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fructose Addiction

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Xezbeth 15:02, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

Fructose Addiction
Neologistic medical cruft article, one of many and probably the only one not yet VfD'd from the author of such now-protected deleted messages as Stop Drinking Soda. Nothing links here. 3 google hits. All refer to the Wikipedia, when this article was on RfD. Kiand 00:14, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Absolutely ridiculous article... Fructose has no proven addictive qualities... And coming from the user that brought you Banana Addiction as well, this has no credibility what soever. Strong Delete. Sasquatch&#08242;&#08596;Talk&#08596;Contributions 00:24, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unverifiable. Andrew Lin is addicted to creating sugar addiction articles. Double Blue  (Talk) 00:51, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Andrew Lin garbage. See Requests for comment/68.170.0.238. - Jersyko talk  01:31, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Hey yo, kicking Fructose through the help of Andrew Lin lost me like 100 lbs. This shit works miracles. BrowardDon 02:17, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment account is a known sockpuppet and has been adding vfd notices to some articles that are obvious keeps. The account was created yesterday. - Jersyko  talk  02:39, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lincruft. -- BD2412 talk 02:25, 2005 Jun 16 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fabrication/fantasy/paranoia. Geogre 02:34, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete --Wetman 02:37, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete with extreme prejudice. A &#1080; D &#1103; 01D  TALK  EMAIL  02:59, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Just make it go away. --Xcali 03:06, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, more Andrew Lincruft. I thought this was deleted already.  RickK 05:47, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete because fructose is good for you. Really. Seriously, this seems like original research to me. Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs, Me 08:23, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete About the kindest thing one can say of this is that it's original research. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 13:05, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and protect. Aecis 13:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- The Anome 13:24, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nonsense. Matjlav 20:38, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless proven true and notable.--Poli 21:11, 2005 Jun 21 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .