Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frugalware

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was it's a copyvio. The article was tagged as such. - Mgm|(talk) July 5, 2005 07:54 (UTC)

Frugalware
Wikipedia isn't an FAQ. Delete - Mgm|(talk) July 4, 2005 12:06 (UTC)
 * If it's non notable, delete, if it's notable keep and expand/rewrite. --129.217.139.206 4 July 2005 12:13 (UTC)
 * It's certainly notable and under active development. The article needs clean-up, I agree the FAQ part should go. Why not give it a chance? Strong keep.--129.217.139.206 4 July 2005 12:32 (UTC)
 * Delete - No, this is not notable, although the subject might be, this article is beyond redemption as it appears to be cut-and-paste from elsewhere. And bear in mind, anonymous user, that your comments will carry lots more weight if you sign in and give yourself a name - it's free, so why not give it a go? Naturenet | Talk 4 July 2005 12:41 (UTC)
 * Too lazy. For the moment, anyway. I'm not affiliated with them if you're worried, although I'm afraid you'll have to take an AC's word on it. ;) The distribution is listed on DistroWatch and has gotten front page mentions on various central Linux sites like newsforge. This establishes its notability in my view. --129.217.139.206 4 July 2005 13:02 (UTC)
 * Agreed, definitely notable. But, it's a copyvio at the moment, so it'll have to be deleted and restarted. Definitely a place for it here, though. --Alex12 3 4 July 2005 13:06 (UTC)
 * Yes, I guess it's hard to argue with that. I registered an account, btw. Justified paragraphs, cool. --Moritz 4 July 2005 13:17 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a copyvio from the Frugalware website, so I'll start the copyvio process. The subject is notable, though, so this should be started over. --Alex12 3 4 July 2005 13:00 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, Splash's on the case. --Alex12 3 4 July 2005 13:03 (UTC)
 * This is a copyvio from here. I've marked it as such. -Splash July 4, 2005 13:02 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.